Commit fc22b6623b (generated columns) replaced ExecGetUpdatedCols() with
ExecGetAllUpdatedCols() in a couple places handling UPDATE (triggers and
lock mode). However, ExecGetUpdatedCols() did exec_rt_fetch() while
ExecGetAllUpdatedCols() also allocates memory through bms_union()
without paying attention to the memory context and happened to use the
long-lived ExecutorState, leaking the memory until the end of the query.
The amount of leaked memory is proportional to the number of (updated)
attributes, types of UPDATE triggers, and the number of processed rows
(which for UPDATE ... FROM ... may be much higher than updated rows).
Fixed by switching to the per-tuple context in GetAllUpdatedColumns().
This is fine for all in-core callers, but external callers may need to
copy the result. But we're not aware of any such callers.
Note the issue was introduced by fc22b6623b, but the macros were later
renamed by f50e888990.
Backpatch to 12, where the issue was introduced.
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Tom Lane, Jakub Wartak
Backpatch-through: 12
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/222a3442-7f7d-246c-ed9b-a76209d19239@enterprisedb.com
The GUC settings lc_collate and lc_ctype are from a time when those
locale settings were cluster-global. When those locale settings were
made per-database (PG 8.4), the settings were kept as read-only. As
of PG 15, you can use ICU as the per-database locale provider, so
examining these settings is already less meaningful and possibly
confusing, since you need to look into pg_database to find out what is
really happening, and they would likely become fully obsolete in the
future anyway.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/696054d1-bc88-b6ab-129a-18b8bce6a6f0@enterprisedb.com
The apply worker was not reloading the configuration while processing
messages if there is a continuous flow of messages from upstream. It was
also not reloading the configuration if there is a change in the
configuration after it has waited for the message and before receiving the
new replication message. This can lead to failure in tests because we
expect that after reload, the behavior of apply worker to respect the
changed GUCs.
We found this while analyzing a rare buildfarm failure.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716AF9079CC0755CD015322947E9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
A new-style SQL function can contain a parse-time dependency
on a unique index, much as views and matviews can (such cases
arise from GROUP BY and ON CONFLICT clauses, for example).
To dump and restore such a function successfully, pg_dump must
postpone the function until after the unique index is created,
which will happen in the post-data part of the dump. Therefore
we have to remove the normal constraint that functions are
dumped in pre-data. Add code similar to the existing logic
that handles this for matviews. I added test cases for both
as well, since code coverage tests showed that we weren't
testing the matview logic.
Per report from Sami Imseih. Back-patch to v14 where
new-style SQL functions came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2C1933AB-C2F8-499B-9D18-4AC1882256A0@amazon.com
Two places in pg_dump_sort.c were using pg_log_info() to add
more details to a message printed with pg_log_warning().
This is bad, because at default verbosity level we would
print the warning line but not the details. One should use
pg_log_warning_detail() or pg_log_warning_hint() instead.
Commit 9a374b77f got rid of most such abuses, but unaccountably
missed these.
Noted while studying a bug report from Sami Imseih.
Back-patch to v15 where 9a374b77f came in. (Prior versions
don't have the missing-details misbehavior, for reasons
I didn't bother to track down.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2C1933AB-C2F8-499B-9D18-4AC1882256A0@amazon.com
When we're deleting a no-op LEFT JOIN from the query, we must remove
the join's joinclauses from surviving relations' joininfo lists.
The invention of "cloned" clauses in 2489d76c4 broke the logic for
that; it'd fail to remove clones that include OJ relids outside the
doomed join's min relid sets, which could happen if that join was
previously discovered to commute with some other join.
This accidentally failed to cause problems in the majority of cases,
because we'd never decide that such a cloned clause was evaluatable at
any surviving join. However, Richard Guo discovered a case where that
did happen, leading to "no relation entry for relid" errors later.
Also, adding assertions that a non-removed clause contains no Vars from
the doomed join exposes that there are quite a few existing regression
test cases where the problem happens but is accidentally not exposed.
The fix for this is just to include the target join's commute_above_r
and commute_below_l sets in the relid set we test against when
deciding whether a join clause is "pushed down" and thus not
removable.
While at it, do a little refactoring: the join's relid set can be
computed inside remove_rel_from_query rather than in the caller.
Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_PHrRqTKDNnTRsxxQy6BtYCVKsgXm1_gdN2yQ=kmcO5g@mail.gmail.com
Avoid "right sibling's left-link doesn't match" errors when vacuuming a
corrupt nbtree index. Just LOG the issue and press on. That way VACUUM
will have a decent chance of finishing off all required processing for
the index (and for the table as a whole).
This error was seen in the field from time to time (it's more than a
theoretical risk), so giving VACUUM the ability to press on like this
has real value. Nothing short of a REINDEX is expected to fix the
underlying index corruption, so giving up (by throwing an error) risks
making a bad situation far worse. Anything that blocks forward progress
by VACUUM like this might go unnoticed for a long time. This could
eventually lead to a wraparound/xidStopLimit outage.
Note that _bt_unlink_halfdead_page() has always been able to bail on
page deletion when the target page's left sibling page was in an
inconsistent state. It now does the same thing (returns false to back
out of the second phase of deletion) when it notices sibling link
corruption in the target page's right sibling page.
This is similar to the work from commit 5b861baa (later backpatched as
commit 43e409ce), which taught nbtree to press on with vacuuming an
index when page deletion fails to "re-find" a downlink in the target
page's parent page. The "re-find" check seems to make VACUUM bail on
page deletion more often in practice, but there is no reason to take any
chances here.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzko2q2kP1+UvgJyP9g0mF4hopK0NtQZcxwvMv9_ytGhkQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11- (all supported versions).
We've had multiple issues with the clause_is_computable_at logic that
I introduced in 2489d76c4: it's been known to accept more than one
clone of the same qual at the same plan node, and also to accept no
clones at all. It's looking impractical to get it 100% right on the
basis of the currently-stored information, so fix it by introducing a
new RestrictInfo field "incompatible_relids" that explicitly shows
which outer joins a given clone mustn't be pushed above.
In principle we could populate this field in every RestrictInfo, but
that would cost space and there doesn't presently seem to be a need
for it in general. Also, while deconstruct_distribute_oj_quals can
easily fill the field with the remaining members of the commutative
join set that it's considering, computing it in the general case
seems again pretty complicated. So for now, just fill it for
clone quals.
Along the way, fix a bug that may or may not be only latent:
equivclass.c was generating replacement clauses with is_pushed_down
and has_clone/is_clone markings that didn't match their
required_relids. This led me to conclude that leaving the clone flags
out of make_restrictinfo's purview wasn't such a great idea after all,
so add them.
Per report from Richard Guo.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48EYi_9-pSd0ORes1kTmTeAjT4Q3gu49hJtYCbSn2JyeA@mail.gmail.com
2dcd1578c4 left the --role option undocumented, which is
inconsistent with other deprecated options such as pg_dump's
--blobs and --no-blobs. This change adds --role back to
createuser's documentation and usage output and marks it as
deprecated.
Suggested-by: Peter Eisentraut
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0e85c9e7-4804-1cdb-5a4a-c72c328f9ad8%40enterprisedb.com
Commit f62975b2a made headerscheck and cpluspluscheck a little
smarter than this documentation gave them credit for. Make
their docs match current reality. Also add a warning about the
layer of dust that has settled on the rest of these scripts.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/769950.1684797558@sss.pgh.pa.us
This file could be in the current (build) directory if we just
built it. However, when installing from a VPATH build from a
tarball, it will exist in the source directory and gmake will
therefore not rebuild it. Use the $< macro to find out where
gmake found it.
Oversight in b3a0d8324, which also exposes a buildfarm testing gap:
we test install from VPATH builds from bare source trees, but not
from tarballs.
Per report from Christoph Berg.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZGzEAqjxkkoY3ooH@msg.df7cb.de
That's how other boolean options are handled, so do likewise.
The previous coding with "enable" and "disable" was seemingly
modeled on gssencmode, but that's a three-way flag.
While at it, add PGGSSDELEGATION to the set of environment
variables cleared by pg_regress and Utils.pm.
Abhijit Menon-Sen, per gripe from Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230522091609.nlyuu4nolhycqs2p@alvherre.pgsql
This change renames --admin to --with-admin, --role to --member-of,
and --member to --with-member. Many people found the previous
names to be confusing. The --admin and --member options are new in
v16, but --role has been there for a while, so that one has been
kept (but left undocumented) for backward compatibility.
Suggested-by: Peter Eisentraut
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZFvVZvQDliIWmOwg%40momjian.us
Tomas Vondra